![]()
flash photography techniques
intro page | natural looking flash | flash & ambient light
![]()
Making flash not look like flash:
I use flash very often in my professional work and personal work. But I try and make the use of flash not appear intrusive in the photograph. I nearly always have an on-camera flash, but I try to diffuse it or bounce it wherever possible. I use as little direct flash as I can, except outdoors where I try and use available light, and use flash only to lift the shadows and reduce the contrast. However, sometimes it is just best to overpower the ambient light with flash – but still try to make it look natural, ie, not like flash.
Let’s start off with these few photos. They were all done using flash on camera.
You’ll note that there is no discernable flash shadow. I absolutely loathe a distinct flash shadow. So that’s the ideal that I always strive for – that it shouldn’t be obvious that I didn’t just use existing light. It isn’t always possible, but that is what I try for in every photograph.
![]() |
This was shot at f2, with flash bounced directly behind me into the open room to just help lift the shadows. Note, there is NO flash shadow.I purposely didn’t use a diffuser dome / Stofen omnibounce here, since it would’ve thrown too much flash directly forward. I needed all the flash to be indirect.
specific settings: My choice of settings here were dictated by the available light, and I just used a hint of flash by bouncing it into the huge room behind me. At f2, and as fill, I didn’t need to blast a ton of light from my strobe. |
.
| Flash bounced over my left shoulder. Note that there is NO direct flash, and hence no flash shadow.specific settings: Nikon D2H Nikon 28-70mm f2.8 1/250th @ f4 @ 400 iso manual; matrix metering TTL flash: +1 exp comp The high shutter speed was a specific choice so that the stained-glass window wouldn’t be blown out, but instead retain the colours. The bride was entirely lit by bounced flash, so by controlling my shutter speed (for my chosen aperture and iso), I could match the exposure for the window. I bounced flash off that sand-coloured brickwork, and this did affect my colour balance – but since I shoot in raw, correcting the WB was no effort. |
![]() |
With those two photos different flash exposure compensation was set.
In the first image, the flash was used as subtle fill-flash, and therefore the flash compensation was dialed down.
In the 2nd image, the bride’s face is lit entirely by flash. Hence my flash is my main source of light. So I would have to start somewhere around 0 EV compensation. But from experience I knew that the lighter toned face, and white dress and the backlighting would influence my flash exposure. So I dialled in more flash exposure.
In this next image, I bounced my on-camera strobe off the wall directly behind me.
One of the best pieces of advice I can give regarding using bounce flash, is not to get stuck on the idea that you need a ceiling above you to bounce flash. Look around for other surfaces that can be used.
By making my light source larger than just the area of the small flash tube, I am immediately making my light softer. And this is exactly the reason why we bounce flash.
![]() |
Before setting this up, I made a few test shots to see that the city lights are correctly exposed. Then I positioned the couple.Because I wanted to move around, I decided to use TTL and not manual flash – but this meant I had to bracket my exposures and ride my flash compensation.
specific settings: The slow shutter speed is to allow the city lights to record. Because the flash and the city lights are vastly different in colour temperature, I fixed it in post-production. With raw, it was little effort to create two images with different WB settings, and then combining them with layers in Photoshop. |
.
![]()
.
And onto more examples, and info on how to match available light and flash …
.
![]()
.
.
Please feel free contact me with comments & questions.
Neil van NiekerkIf you need more direct help or instruction on flash photography, I do present workshops and seminars, and I also offer individual tutoring sessions.
If you feel that you have benefited from these webpages, then using the B&H link to order any equipment and goodies would be a welcome way of helping towards the cost of hosting these webpages. Thanks!
.





















































Amazing site, but something you said above caught my eye. “I bounced flash off that sand-coloured brickwork, and this did affect my colour balance…”
How do you adjust your white balance when you’re bouncing light off all kinds of crazy surfaces throughout a shoot but don’t have a grey card in the shot? Do you use the white wedding dress? Or do you do it by eye?
Comment by RFS — August 12, 2009 @ 8:36 am
As usual, great tutorial Neil!
RFS, like Neil said in this post, he shoots in RAW so he doesn’t have to worry about the WB at time of shoot and correcting the it later is easy.
Comment by larimarco — August 12, 2009 @ 12:54 pm
Hi Neil,
Just a quick question…..
When you are using direct flash, or indirect I suppose, for fill flash during the evening when the sun’s light is more golden, do you ever gel the flash to bring the cooler light inline with the sun’s color?
I’m guessing that you would do that but I’d like to know for sure.
Thanks
Steve
Comment by Steve Crouch — August 18, 2009 @ 8:05 am
Comment by Neil — August 18, 2009 @ 4:15 pm
Neil,
Funnily enough that’s the photo that prompted me to ask the question! I saw it in your book and wondered.
Great book by the way, so much info to get the brain working – it’s interesting to see how you think about certain situations and lighting conditions. Once you see the infomation in front of you it seems so obvious, I could have been messing about with all this for years without your help and guidance. Many thanks for sharing your knowledge.
Steve
Comment by Steve — August 18, 2009 @ 6:21 pm
I am just delving into flash photography. Your site is a great resource and your book should be en route to me now. As I read on I may find my answer but here is one burning question I have. Why are you shooting at high ISO. Why not do everything at 100. I have been doing microstock for the past 6 months and it has turned me into a pixel peeper and with My Canon 50D I see noise at 100% above ISO 200.
Comment by Bob Keenan — August 23, 2009 @ 7:17 pm
Comment by Neil — August 27, 2009 @ 5:23 am
I can’t thank you enough for the knowledge shared. I loved your site, thanks.
Comment by DINESH — September 8, 2009 @ 12:59 pm
Neil,
So impressed with the results of your bounced flash. I would like to use bounced flash in a way that lights the subject directionally and softly (large point source, of course) BUT – that also falls off fairly rapidly so the background is fairly dark with only hints of detail. Obviously, that could be achieved primarily by moving subjects away from background. But if mobility is not an option, can you suggest some tips to achieve this?
Thanks, Bob
Comment by Bob — September 10, 2009 @ 6:15 am
Comment by Neil — September 19, 2009 @ 2:24 am
Niel,
I’m reading your book and this helpful site. Maybe I’ve missed it, but what determines the amount of flash compensation should be used? No doubt experience will be the most help, eventually. But where do we start?
Comment by Dwayne Zimmerman — September 22, 2009 @ 9:04 am
Comment by Neil — September 23, 2009 @ 2:13 am
Neil, for image one, you mention that your camera settings were chosen based on the ambient light. For image two, what were they based on? The fact that you knew you needed a slower shutter speed to retain the colors of the window (i.e. – let the colors “burn in”? What if you didn’t care about the colors in the background? What would dictate your settings then? Also, when flash is used to override ambient light, what dictates your settings? Do you make a decision on one of the variables and then adjust the others based on the histogram, etc. I just bought your book – sorry if this is all covered there! Thanks
Comment by Kristin Ahern — October 19, 2009 @ 7:39 pm
Comment by Neil — October 23, 2009 @ 3:42 am
[...] Este artículo es una traducción del post original en ingles de Neil van Niekerk, con el permiso del propietario del copyright. 01 – natural looking flash [...]
Pingback by ARGI-ITZALAK » 01.- Flash con un aspecto natural — November 30, 2009 @ 3:04 pm
I don’t understand bouncing flash (yet). In the first photo, you say you bounced the flash into a huge room behind you. Huh? You shot the flash into a big open space? What exactly is it bouncing off? In the second photo, you say you bounced the flash off the wall behind the bride. How then is her face lit?
Comment by Kris Hunt — December 18, 2009 @ 12:22 pm
Comment by Neil — December 19, 2009 @ 3:41 am
Hi Mr Neil !
How are you ? i have a question i have used the speedlight 580 EX 2 – but i would like to use more flash for example 2 – 3 so i can use another flashes not canon ?
Last time i tried a opteka TTL flash with my canon flash, when my master canon works the my opteka slave was stil flash the same time – but when i saw on the picture it got too dark !!!
please ,explain to me
thanks
hope you be well ,alway
Hapy newyear
your reader
Duc Le
Comment by Duc Le — December 30, 2009 @ 10:57 pm
Comment by Neil — December 31, 2009 @ 1:20 am
I just finished reading your articles on flash photography, and I must first say thanks for all the information you shared and the depth in which you covered it.
My question is this, you mention a few times that you bounce the flash behind you. How did you accomplish this feat? I am using the Canon 580EX, and while it can rotate 180 degrees, it cannot face backwards. Do you use a reflector of some kind?
Much Thanks,
Phil
Comment by Phillip — January 18, 2010 @ 9:26 pm
Comment by Neil — January 18, 2010 @ 9:36 pm
Well I meant 180 TOTAL but I felt you wouldn’t have replied like that without reason so I went back to my flash and tried to rotate it again, past +-90 degrees. Turns out it was a little stubborn to get past there the first time, but now it does in fact rotate 180 degrees in either direction. Great discovery for me, it’s like I have a new flash!
Thanks,
Phil
Comment by Phillip — January 20, 2010 @ 8:14 am
Comment by Neil — January 20, 2010 @ 12:43 pm